|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
THE PYRAMID TEXTS 14
THE FIELD THE QUEST FOR THE SECRET FORCE OF THE UNIVERSE Lynne McTaggart 2001 LIGHT IN THE DARKNESS Page III "Physics may be about to face a revolution similar to that which occurred just a century ago. . . Arthur C. Clarke, 'When Will the Real Space Age Begin?' If an angel was to tell us about his philosophy. . . many of his statements might well sound like 2x2 = 13" Georg Christophe Lichtenburg, Aphorisms
Page 13 "Subatomic particles had no meaning as isolated entities but could only be understood in their realationships. The world at its most basic, existed as a complex web of interdependant relationships, forever indivisible"
http://www.pyramidtexts.com/article3.htm 1 The Great Pyramid Texts (Cont) By Clesson H. Harvey "On the desert plateau of Saqqara 10 miles Southeast of the Great Pyramid, a special set of five very similar pyramids has stood for some forty-two centuries. They are filled with over four thousand columns of hieroglyphs, cut into their solid rock walls.But why do these 'Pyramid Texts' suddenly appear -- and for the most part in just the 5th Dynasty pyramid of King Un-is and the 6th Dynasty pyramids of Teti, Pepi I, Mer-en-r'a and Pepi II?
I think that what follows may provide an explanation, because Egyptologists simply do not know. And who is this strange King Un-is anyway, whose very name means that he is "Like one whose Spiritual Eye is opened?" All five of these Kings believed that this "Eye of the Soul" was real and accessible. In fact (unlike Egyptologists today), they apparently assumed that this "Udjat Eye of Heru" was the foundation of their whole Hieroglyphic language and as such, it provided an indispensable context for understanding all Pyramid Texts.
It is comparatively easy to show that the writings in all five pyramids are clearly distributed in four matching instruction locations corresponding to the Great Pyramid Entrance Passage, Queen's Chamber, Grand Gallery and King's Chamber. The five Kings evidently wanted to have a kind of stenographic record of the words which must have been said countless times in each Great Pyramid location while facing in different directions.
Egyptologists are fond of saying that the Great Pyramid is mute, with no Hieroglyphs cut into its walls. But this is really not quite true. Every upper passage, chamber, gallery and shaft inside the Great Pyramid of Giza is an incredibly old, unmistakable, megalithic Hieroglyph for the words seba and rut for "Ensouling Star door" and "Tunnel Opening gate." They are unmistakably reproduced in the Pyramid Texts of Saqqara. Egyptologists should have told the world about these architectural hieroglyphs long ago. It might have removed much needless speculation about the Great Pyramid.
Egyptologists are also fond of imagining that they have already translated the Pyramid Texts, but this is not even remotely true. Already in the first third of the twentieth century, the great German scholar Kurt Sethe was deciding to dismiss the first 212 Utterances of the Pyramid Texts ostensibly because they were supposed to be just "largely ritual formulae." These mostly non-ritual texts covered more than the North walls of the Saqqara King's Chambers -- with the "Eye of Heru" being written out 80 times, where it had survived. In 1969, R. O. Faulkner published the last attempt to translate the Pyramid Texts. But Egyptologists still believe that these North wall writings of the Saqqara King's Chambers are just "offering rituals."
They are wrong on both counts. These texts are neither "offerings" nor largely "rituals." The "offering" idea hangs precariously on the supposed meaning of the imperative phrase Me-en-ek as "Take-to-yourself (the Eye of Heru)," when it could just as well mean an archaic "See for yourself (the Eye of Heru)" in which case there would be no offerings in the mostly non-ritual writings on the wall. The few ritual writings which are actually there are divided off to themselves by 390 separation lines, unmistakably sculpted in the solid rock. But Egyptologists have chosen to ignore them and have tarred all of these texts with the same ritual brush.
On the South walls of the Saqqara King's Chambers, Egyptologists think they see "resurrection ritual." But these texts are strictly non-ritual and do not contain any ritual separation lines. The word sedjeb for "restore (to life)" is a causative verb se-djeb (a) for "make clothed (with a body)" which any Hindu Sanskrit scholar would recognize as the verb "reincarnate."
We do not have to guess about the significance of these texts. They are self-explanatory. For example Utterance 302, out of a total of 700, begins (on the North wall in the Queen's Chamber) with the expression Djed medu for "Said (in the Queen's Chamber facing North) were the words:" --- "whenever the Sharp-pointed Star gleams (two palm-widths before the brow), it is because the Two Sets of Nine Spinal gods have purified in the Ursa Major Polestar, that Star which knows not sweeping. --- " But the Great Pyramid speaker is describing the Northern sky as it looked 26,000 years ago! Egyptologists see only "protective spells" on the West wall of the Saqqara King's Chamber. But the verb to protect is nowhere to be found. Worse still, there are no actual spells. Some important details about seeing with the Eye can only be found on this wall. But these details have been lost to the world, because Egyptologists have not been able to conceive of the non-ritual Eye of Heru. All that they know about now is the ritual Eye as a ceremonial offering. The lost knowledge of the Star Opening of the Eye at two palm-widths is still accessible to the entire world on this West wall. Not knowing about the non-ritual Eye of Heru has helped to blind Egyptologists to the unexpected presence of Calculus and Nuclear Chemistry within it, which we have only acquired in the last 333 years. 2 The Great Pyramid Texts (Cont) By Clesson H. Harvey The Great Pyramid Texts (Cont)By Clesson H. HarveyBuried in Gardiner's "Egyptian Grammar" is what may be described as a most probable translation method. Scattered about amidst many possible alternative approaches is a computer friendly translation technique which works well for the Saqqara Pyramid Texts, even when the context is unknown. But the Eye of Heru soon emerges automatically as the missing context and turns out to be an artificial basis of the Hieroglyphic language itself. This should not happen when a language evolves over thousands of years, but it has happened in the Great Pyramid Texts. Like the artificial Aymara language referred to on p.91 in "Fingerprints of the Gods," the Saqqara Pyramid Texts turn out to be, after 40 years of searching, programmable.
These texts also have a special usage of the usual 'narrative' sedjem en ef form of "he has heard" which no translator has thus far recognized and exploited. This grammatical construct influences the meaning of about half of these writings. As a result, Egyptologists have in effect been trying to translate them, armed only with 50% of the required grammar.
Oddly enough, the last three of the five Saqqara Kings (Pepi I, Mer-en-r'a and Pepi II) even tried to demonstrate this special usage in their pyramids. However Egyptologists have found these demonstrations incomprehensible, so that the important general usage of an understood 'eternal truth' (en) sedjem en ef form of "(it is because) he has heard" has been ignored in their 'translations.' Three remarkable Kings each went to the trouble of actually cutting the usually understood 'introductory conjunction' en (for "it is because") into the West wall of their King's Chamber at the start of Utterances 432 and 443. This generalizing 'eternal truth' form has a profound effect on sentence structure in the Great Pyramid Texts which no present 'translation' can possibly reflect. The vocabulary word meanings in Gardiner's "Egyptian Grammar" have been for many years the most reliable ones in the entire language. But there are many important words in the Saqqara pyramids which are not completely understood. A large number of these words have meanings which are little more than educated guesses on the part of Egyptologists and the rest have completely unknown meanings.
The discovery by Champollion of the Hieroglyphic alphabet in 1822 has made it possible for Egyptologists to learn how to spell Hieroglyphic words. With few exceptions, the correct spelling of every word in the five Saqqara pyramids is now known with remarkable certainty. Gardiner's "Egyptian Grammar" also includes in its vocabulary the meanings of a few letters of the alphabet. But the absence of any Hieroglyphic vowels makes such a search for alphabetical meaning difficult if not impossible. However the 24 consonantal letters of the pyramid alphabet are still Hieroglyphic pictures of actual objects which in some cases amount to alphabetical meanings. The alphabet in this sense can be said to have at least some meanings. But what about a word? Does its consonantal spelling contain any clues to its consonantal meaning? Orthodox Egyptology would say no. But if the Hieroglyphic grammar of the Great Pyramid Texts if artificially programmed (and it is), then whoever programmed it would almost certainly have programmed the meanings of its words. There is much evidence in support of this. Gardiner's reliable vocabulary of word definitions can usually be used to test any such theory of programmed word meanings. there is no need to be discouraged by the educated nay opinions of Egyptologists. The prize after all is nothing less than the complete decipherment of the Hieroglyphs. The most promising approach to completing the decipherment of words is the exploration of defining puns for them, using the 24 alphabetical meanings and pictographs combined with the artificially programmed grammar. There is much more to this method than can be said here, but some of its results may help to show how it works. As has been said, the Hieroglyphic language is fundamentally connected with the Eye of Heru. This can be shown by the spelling of its prepositions. For example, the preposition khenet for "in front of" is defined by its spelling to be "the sphere of the Eye." And, the preposition kher for "near" is similarly defined to be "the sphere of the Star Opening." The concepts of "being in front of" and "nearness" were both thought of as 'being two palm-widths before the brow' in visual consciousness. Sometimes the result can be a little amusing, as when heneqet for "beer" is defined by its spelling to be "the power for being high."
The Great Pyramid Texts should be translated programmably in both grammar and consistent word meanings. But they are now 'translated' according to the caprice of each individual Egyptologist and freely rewritten. Knowledge of a lost civilization has been needlessly lost to the world. As a simple example of the damaging effect of such abuses, the programmably translated punch line 116d at the end of the 'Grand Gallery' Utterance 200 'facing North' is "O Eye of Heru, you are higher and you are greater than the King." But Faulkner has "O Eye of Horus, be high and great on the King," where he thought the Eye of Horus was nothing but some incense. If there is any truth to the existence of a lost civilization, the Great Pyramid Texts must have something to say about it, in all those four thousand columns of Hieroglyphs! The most secret doctrines of the Egyptians are openly explained with no recourse to "enigmatic writing" as actually happened much later in the New Kingdom for concealment. Egyptologists do not see any lost civilizations in their 'translations.' Their dictionaries do not contain any lost civilization words, even as a speculation. But this is just because they cannot conceive of a non-ritual Eye of Heru evolving in humanity through primeval times paut. Our knowledge of Mathematics, Physics, History and the Hieroglyphs has progressed far enough to reveal unmistakable evidence for the existence of highly advanced lost civilizations. The Great Pyramid Texts deal with a strange island of visual consciousness which is initially Star-like called the Eye of Heru two palm-widths before the brow. The same Star is referred to in the Kashmir Shaivism text, "Spanda Karikas" translated into English by Jaideva Singh in 1980, where it says on p.147, "From it, i.e. from 'Unmesa: Lit. Opening of the eye' which is being practised appear in a short time experience like the light of a star in the middle of the two eyebrows ..." The Pyramid Texts describe a loss of the Eye which happened during the lost civilizations of Easterners and Westerners. The Spiritual being who was the Chief, Khenet, of the Westerners (Imenetiu) was Osiris, Us-Ir. Egyptologists have made some very bad educational guesses about the meaning of the word Duat as "Netherworld." They know perfectly well that there is nothing "nether" about the word nor is there any known connection with some kind of "world." Anyone who reads the Saqqara pyramid Hieroglyphs knows that they are mostly about the grammatically feminine Eye Iret of Heru. As a result, such readers know that any anonymous feminine pronouns probably refers to this feminine Eye. For the same reason, they know that any functional noun with an otherwise anonymous feminine t ending also refers to the Eye. These anonymous feminine gender rules are really never broken in these texts. The word Duat is not likely to be any exception. Dua means "dawning" and when the t ending is added, Duat should mean "the dawning Eye." The Duat is then anything which is seen in the Eye of Heru, no matter what world it happens to be in. Egyptologists no longer even try to translate the ancient word Us-Ir, because they think that it has undergone too many changes in the course of time. Perhaps it has... after the Old Kingdom. But in the Great Pyramid Texts, the word can be translated. It is always sculpted in exactly the same way thousands of times in all five Saqqara pyramids. The five Saqqara Kings evidently did not wish there to be any doubt about it. In these texts, the word Us is interchangeable with Set for "Activity or Activator" and the word Ir is interchangeable with Iret for "the Eye." As a result, the discarnated entity Us-Ir was the supreme "Activator of the Eye" for the lost civilizations of Easterners iabetiu and Westerners imenetiu. On p.88 in Heaven's Mirror, some of the illustrated texts on the second shrine of Tutankhamen are reproduced. The two groups of figures have large wonderfully clear Hieroglyphic texts of explanation in front of them which Piankoff does not translate. But he does provide a translation of the smaller 'enigmatic inscriptions' above the sets of six figures, "(These gods are like this ...)" and continuing below the Ascending Cobra's triple fire striking the brow of the first figure "when the Star of the Soul comes." In front of the second figure where the triple fire from the Star is striking the brow, the explanation is still "when the Star of the Soul comes." The Star is shown coming to the same person in six different levels of 'Chakra' experience in the spinal serpent which was also shown in the complete illustration. The next group of six figures has a similar meaning with six identical texts again written in front of each figure. (These gods are like this ...) "when the Star of R'a comes" (in six different ways). The same six levels are described in the Great Pyramid Texts on the South wall of the King's Chambers. The rest of these Tutankhamen sets of six gods indicate that while visual concentration on the Seba Star of the Great Pyramid darkness is everything, the automatic power of breathing through the mouth is also involved in opening the Eye of Heru. Throughout these texts, Egyptologists have never understood that the astronomical Stars were always being used as precise metaphors for fundamental Spiritual Stars in consciousness which are clearly defined in the known meanings of their names. The same thing is true of the physical Sky as an excellent metaphor for a Heavenly Sky or Spiritual Blue Void. Egyptologists have a bad habit of transforming any direct spiritual instruction into an impossible command to a Candidate King. In three Queen's Chambers facing West, the programmably translated words of line 904c were said: "Your Soul is like a living Star standing out from its brothers." Faulkner has a much less probable "Be a soul like a living star at the head of its brethren!" And he removed the pronoun ek for "you or your." 3 The Great Pyramid Texts (Cont) By Clesson H. Harvey It is obvious that the Eye of Heru in the following 'dismissed' Utterance 81 of the Pyramid Texts is much more than Faulkner's "Hymn for awakening the king, adapted to presentation of napkins." 56a. Said [in the King's Chamber facing north] were the words: You (O Eye) wake in calm, so that wake in calm will the Veil, so that wake in calm will that Eye which is veiled, ... 57c. You sit, O Eye, [two palm-widths] in front of a Candidate King as his god, so that You will open his path to the fore among the Spirits, 57d. So that he will stand [or remain attentively fixed] to the fore among the Spirits like 'One who brings about Levitation' to the fore among the Westerners. 57e. (You sit, O Eye,) toward the front, toward the front, near an 'Activator of the Eye.' At some point, Egyptologists will have to recognize that there is such a thing as non-ritual, advanced knowledge in The Great Pyramid Texts. Much of this information is faithfully preserved in the later Coffin Texts and New Kingdom Books. But the 'Translations' are so incomplete, inconsistent and ritually slanted that any such advanced knowledge has been effectively lost. Fortunately, Egyptologists have done at least one thing right. They have restored and preserved much of the original Hieroglyphic texts.
The Saqqara Pyramid Texts are filled with advanced knowledge about the Tunnel of Near Death Experiences, which only just began to be rediscovered scientifically in the 20th century from the black-out experiences of healthy young Air Force pilots subjected to high g-forces in a giant centrifuge. This NDE knowledge also resurfaces in the 44th 'Spell' of the "Book of the Dead" but it is still mostly lost to the world, because of some of the biggest blunders in Egyptology. These last involve the two words re and tjepehet along with the expression ikhem sek.
If an Ancient Egyptian were alive today, he would grieve, from his point of view, for a whole world which is doomed to die a second time after physical death in a 'purgatory' of total personality destruction and death, instead of an immortality of high identity and memory. And all because of not knowing about "The Tunnel Opening or 'Spell' for not dying a second time in the realm of the dead."
Said were the words by Ani:
My Tunnel is opened, my Tunnel is opened. Spirits fall inside the darkness, but the Eye of Heru will set me apart from destruction. It is because an Opener of the Paths has reared me, that I have learned how to hide myself amidst you, O you Ensouling Stars who know not sweeping. Re for "mouth," "tunnel opening" or "spell" has at least these three primary meanings according to the dictionaries of Egyptologists. "Mouth" is usually a ritual meaning, but Egyptologists now almost completely ignore their own non-ritual figurative meaning "tunnel opening," which in these texts actually refers to the Star-like "opening" point before the brow of the Tunnel of Near Death Experiences. Egyptologists have instead usually preferred the third meaning of "spell," but this in effect then leads to classifying these texts as ignorant magical mumbo jumbo. However the Star-like point two palm-widths before the brow is a real central point in visual consciousness which every 'Spell' in the "Book of the Dead" is actually talking about. The Hieroglyphic writing of re is the same for all three meanings of the word.
Egyptologists know perfectly well that tjepehet for "cavern" is really a snake hole or "tunnel." It is the Tunnel of Near Death Experiences in 'Spell' 44 and the serpent is the paranormal Levitation Power in that Tunnel, which can temporarily "transform a man into a god."
But the biggest blunder of all is when Egyptologists attempt to define the expression ikhem sek as an astronomical, circumpolar "Imperishable Star" which circumnavigates the north celestial pole without ever going below the horizon. This seemingly reasonable educated guess about the meaning of this expression (and this is all that it is) is wrong on several counts.
In the minds of Egyptologists, ikhem sek for "Star which knows not perishing" is of course "Imperishable Star." But the catch is, that the verb sek can also mean "sweeping (around)" or in New Age jargon "failing to be centered" or "failing to be the Central Star." The "sweeping" meaning also looks like the more primitive root of the "perishing" verb and cannot in any case be distinguished by the Hieroglyphic writing. Consistency really demands "sweeping" over "perishing" in these texts. And so ikhem sek becomes the Ensouling "Star which knows not sweeping" or "Polestar" before the brow in the samadhi of meditation or dying. From the second shrine of Tutankhamen, there at least six of these brow Polestars all stacked up along the line of Sight, where they can be seen only one at a time.
It will be recalled that in the Great Pyramid, the Grand Gallery is a gigantic megalithic Hieroglyph of the word seba for "Ensouling Star door." Even though it is half a football field long and three storeys high, it has the correct shape of an ancient Egyptian door Hieroglyph. However, this is no ordinary door. It is spelled exactly like the noun seba for "Star" and so it is in some sense a "Star door." But again this "door" is spelled exactly like the causative verb se-ba for "cause to be a Soul" or "ensoul" and so in some sense it is also an "Ensouling door." It should now be clear why this Grand Gallery "Ensouling Star door" is so significant in the Great Pyramid, because it is also the paranormal "Star which knows not sweeping" and "Tunnel" of Near Death Experiences throughout The Great Pyramid Texts.
But this strange Polestar-like door is best described in a few selections from its 77 occurrences in the Saqqara lines:
139a. ... it is because the (brow) Polestars (or Chakras) have levitated you (the Candidate King spiritually as well as physically). 148b. ... what is within you is the god who is as in front of the two eyes, a (brow) Polestar. 161a. ... such a Candidate comes ... , a polestar-like Spirit. 530b. (a Candidate) stretches out for himself his polestar-like Members (or Chakras). 724d. You must catch hold toward controlling the Polestars. 733a. ... the Polestars accompany you. 749e. ... amidst the Polestars who accompany an 'Activator of the Eye.' 1216c. ... such Spiritually Great ones (or Mahatmas, not swallows!) are [also] Polestars. 1301a. ... you levitate as Heru of the Dawning Eye who is to the fore among the Polestars, ... 1454b. His Members (or Chakras) are the Polestars. 1490b. ... those who are among the Polestars gleam for you. Returning to Utterance 302, it is extremely important for it to be known, although there is not the slightest chance that its meaning could ever be understood from the current 'Translations' of Egyptologists. It is important because it contains a definite precessional date of 24,000 BC with awesome implications about the history of Saqqara and Giza. It is really quite simple, when the key word meanings are straightened out.
Four thousand years ago, the two Pointer Stars (or 'Adze-Blade') of the Big Dipper pointed out the Star Polaris just as they do today. But at that time, Polaris was not a Polestar. Egyptologists are still a bit confused about the Mesekhetiu-Star. They know that it is somehow connected with an Adze or Big Dipper shaped group of Stars and yet it always has a single Star Determinative. The 'Adze-Blade' Pointer Stars in the Big Dipper always point out the single Star Polaris and so we most probably have mesekhetiu for "Adze-Blade pointed out Star" or "Polaris," and we already have ikhem sek for "Star which knows not sweeping" or brow "Polestar," so that the complete introduction to Utterance 302 becomes;
458a. Said [in the Queen's Chamber facing north in 24,000 BC] were the words: Whenever Heaven causes emission, so that a Sharp Pointed [brow] Star may live, (because a Candidate is verily a living one, a son of a Sharp Pointed Star), 458b. it is because the two sets of Nine Spinal gods have purified for him 458c. in the Adze-Blade pointed-out Star (or Polaris), a Polestar which knows not sweeping [only now and in 24,000 BC]. 4 The Great Pyramid Texts (Cont) By Clesson H. Harvey "The 'Curse' of Tutankhamen is real after all. But it is only dangerous to those who are not in accord with at least the ideal of becoming a Candidate Activator of the Spiritual Eye, those who are 'spiritually impure' in the 'opinion' of the four protective Shrines of Tutankhamen.Thanks to the research of Graham Hancock in "The Sign and the Seal," those four protective Shrines, now located on the second floor of the Cairo Museum, begin to look more like actual 'prototype Arks of the Covenant.' The evidence in support of this possibility is really quite overwhelming.
In the words of Howard Carter, "Magic for once seems to have prevailed (when those Arks successfully protected Tutankhamen's sarcophagus from tomb-robbers in the Valley of the Kings near Luxor)." In his Volume Two on page 38 of "The Tomb of Tut-ankh-Amen," he continues, "For of twenty-seven monarchs of the Imperial Age of Egypt buried in this valley, who have suffered every kind of depredation, Tut-ankh-Amen, throughout those thirty-three centuries, alone has lain unscathed, even though predatory hands violated the chambers of his tomb..." The King's Chamber of his tomb was originally filled with four concentrically nested 'prototype Arks of the Covenant' designed to magically protect his sarcophagus from anyone who was spiritually impure. And incredible as it may appear, there can be no doubt that they actually succeeded. Tomb-robbers broke open the double door seal of the outermost Ark and then just looked inside without penetrating beyond 'the magic barrier.' The fact that Howard Carter himself lasted as long as he did after his penetration is more a tribute to his spiritual purity than anything else. The double door of the second Ark was closed by two ebony door bolts and a frail central cord secured only by a fragile clay seal. The third Ark's double door was similarly sealed, and the fourth Ark's double door had no seal at all. Those two clay seals were all that stood between plundering tomb-robbers and hundreds of pounds of solid gold in the enclosed sarcophagus. What stopped them? As Carter says, the tomb was wide open for many weeks to the prying eyes of every tomb-robber in the valley, while those four Shrines were being assembled by workers from 80 prefabricated parts in the confining space of the King's Chamber. It took Carter and his team 84 days of "hard labor" just to disassemble them in order to remove them.
It looks as though something 'terrible' really did stop all those tomb-robbers. But this would mean that those four Shrines don't just resemble such prototype Arks. They really are prototype Arks of the Covenant. This indeed is what additional evidence will show from, of all places, The Great Pyramid Texts.
The required rectangular box shape of 'terrible power' for any such "monstrous instrument" had to be built into its dimensions, so that a prototype Ark could be activated by and "between the two prototype cherubim" of Isis and Nephthys as described repeatedly in The Great Pyramid Texts for activating the Eye of Heru. Egyptologists have not yet discovered that all four of Tutankhamen's Shrines have a common prefabricated "cross-sectional area" to "length squared" ratio of (9/25) according to the published dimensions in Alexandre Piankoff's "The Shrines of Tut-ankh-Amon." This is the same 'terrible' ratio which was specified for the Biblical Ark of the Covenant. The Nine was a deliberate link to the paranormal forces of the Eye of Heru, when activated by and between the two prototype cherubim. It is not too surprising that Nine might have such a weird connection with miraculous forces because in 1926, Erwin Schroedinger discovered a strange Quantum Mechanical Equation which turned out to have just such a set of Nine prototype solutions for the electron energy structures of the hydrogen atom. As described in "The Sign and the Seal" on pp. 273-6, the Biblical Ark of the Covenant: 1. was "a rectangular chest measuring three feet nine inches by two feet three inches by two feet three inches" which is a special case of the more general (9/25) shape ratio specification referred to earlier for all four Shrines, was "made of acacia wood" (Egyptologists believe the four Shrines are made of cedar wood), was "plated inside and out, with pure gold" (the four Shrines were similarly covered), was decorated "all around with a gold moulding" (all four Shrines have such a moulding all around the top edge of the rectangular box shapes), had placed "on top ... a one piece ... throne of mercy ... with two golden cherubim fastened to the two ends" (all four Shrines have such prototype mercy seat lids with two golden prototype cherubim attached as high-winged serpent forms of Isis and Nephthys), had occasionally "fiery jets" issuing "from the cherubim" ... which "burned and destroyed nearby objects" ( ... it is because a Candidate has come near you, O fiery serpent, PT 194b), "was able to counteract gravity" ( ... Which mechenet Ark Eye shall be brought for you, O Candidate? There shall be brought for a Candidate 'It levitates and It hovers.' PT 494ab), I. repeatedly killed ( ... so that whomever the Godhead wishes that he will live, it is he who will live; and whomever he wishes that he will die, it is he who will die. PT 155d). Three of the four prototype mercy seats are covered with activation texts and illustrations, but they are too far above everyone's head to be visible from below.
If four Prototype Arks of the Covenant can now be in the Cairo museum, there is no reason why the Biblical Ark can't be in Axum, Ethiopia. And if the guardian priest in Axum will not allow us to see the Ark, at least we have four giant prototype Arks to look at whenever we wish to or dare to.
The Great Pyramid Texts, as here conceived, have given a voice to the Great Pyramid. But, in a strangely self-confirming way, they have also given a startlingly unexpected voice to the nearby Great Sphinx temple complex southeast of the Great Pyramid itself.The Sphinx Temple is directly in front of the Great Sphinx, while the so-called Kh'afr'a Valley Temple is just southeast of the Sphinx. The entire Great Sphinx temple complex is presently thought to be devoid of contemporaneously inscribed texts. Egyptologists believe that both temples were built by Kh'afr'a about forty-five centuries ago in the 4th Dynasty. But as argued by John Anthony West on page 214 of "Serpent in the Sky," "The architectural style and building scale of the Sphinx and Sphinx temple complex are unlike anything else in Dynastic Egypt."
The megalithic red granite ashlars, as architectural Hieroglyphs in both temples, alone indicate a predynastic date. According to Mark Lehner on page 126 of "The Complete Pyramids" in the Kh'afr'a Valley Temple "There are 23 statue bases, though the one at the center of the leg of the T-shaped hall is wider and perhaps was counted twice, making 24 in all." And again on page 128 he says that in the Sphinx Temple, "Twenty-four red granite pillars formed a colonnade and ambulatory around a central courtyard." However they have no known purpose.
But in The Great Pyramid Texts, there just happens to be one key Utterance 219 which repeats the same profound prototype Covenant in lines 167b to 167d exactly twenty-four times. As it does this, it seeks to explain the relationship between An Activator of the Eye and the rest of the Universe from the Godhead down to beings like ourselves. Egyptologists do not agree on how to read this prototype Covenant text, but a programmably translated sample has a reasonably clear meaning in this first of its twenty-four parts. 167a. djed Said (in the King's Chamber facing the so-called Kh'afr'a Valley Temple) medu were the words: Tem O Godhead, za ek pu whenever such a son of yours pe nen is this one here, Usir the Activator of the Eye, di en ek it is because you have caused sedjeb ef him to be reincarnated, 'anekh ef so that he may live.
The above Covenant is between the Godhead and such Candidate Activators of the Eye. This Temple structured Utterance with its prototype Covenant is unique in The Great Pyramid Texts. And it really does seem to fit with the actual words which were said before each of those 23 statue bases in the Kh'afr'a Valley Temple. 5 The Great Pyramid Texts (Cont) By Clesson H. Harvey One of the strangest unrecognized facts in Egyptology is the really quite obvious connection between the Saqqara Pyramid Texts and the Great Pyramid of Giza.Egyptologists have known for more than three quarters of a century, that for example there exists a very special set of these Utterances in the Saqqara Sarcophagus Chambers which are repeated on the very same wall in two or more of the five Saqqara Pyramids. But this perfect pattern of repetition has a profound meaning for Egyptology and cannot be safely dismissed.
Do Egyptologists really need to have the significance of these repetitions explained to them, before they can understand what they should have realized nearly a century ago? No competent Egyptologist can deny that these exclusively repeated Utterances are clearly classifiable as Sarcophagus or King's Chamber Texts, even belonging to the same walls. There can be no reasonable doubt that such Utterances belonged as much to the King's Chamber of the Great Pyramid as to the King's Chambers in the five Saqqara Pyramids. And this means that we really do have wonderful evidence for what actually took place in the King's Chamber of the Great Pyramid.
Utterances 23, 25, 32-57, 72-79, 81-96 and 108-141 belonged to the North wall and were said in the King's Chamber of the Great Pyramid or any sufficiently similar Pyramid.
Utterances 207-208, 210-212, 338-347, 355, 357, 459, 593-597, 599-602 and 604 belonged to the East wall of the King's Chamber, where with some help from the 'pun decipherment' of untranslated artificial words and using for the Egyptian letter 'a our English letter "short o" which came originally through Latin, Greek and Phoenician from the alphabetical 'ayin or "forearm" Hieroglyphic letter, Utterance 341 contains wonderful information about the Great Sphinx.
341555a. ... un Whenever opened her is the Sight en Heru of Heru in Aker by the Great Sphinx unand whenever opened her is the Sight en Aker of the Great Sphinx in Heru by Heru,
"Aker" is Hieroglyphically written out in the five Saqqara Pyramids with a dozen determinative pictographs clearly illustrating "the Great Sphinx."
Utterances 218 and 219 belonged exclusively to the South wall of the King's Chamber, where the 23 statue bases in 'Khafra's Valley Temple' are involved in 219.
Utterances 332, 335-336, 422-432, 437-438, 440-455 and 589-590 belonged exclusively to the West wall of the King's Chamber, where the Aker-Sphinx is again involved in 437 and what looks like Plato's Atlantis is twice referred to in 422 and 442." Utterances 303-305 and 308 belonged exclusively to the North wall of the Queen's Chamber in the Great Pyramid, Utterances 273-274, 277, 280-293, 295-296, 299, 384, 408 and 419-421 belonged exclusively to the East wall of the Queen's Chamber and
Utterances 260-261 and 488 may have belonged exclusively to the South wall of the Queen's Chamber but this cannot be confirmed by repetition owing to massive destruction in most of the South walls.There is an interesting Aker-Sphinx text in 261 which has survived." All things considered, Plato's Atlantis looks like an Azores Islands superpower Capital of a worldwide Empire with some very strange secluded Rulers. 6The Great Pyramid Texts (Cont) By Clesson H. Harvey The Great Pyramid Texts of Ancient Egypt are the legacy of a Lost Civilization, so advanced, that we have only just begun to catch up with it in the last 314 years. This quite easily provable fact is still not known or even suspected by the Science of Egyptology. Instead, all we have is a representative Egyptologist in a Television Documentary challenging, "Show me a potsherd!" But the exact evidence supporting the existence of an Advanced Lost Civilization is not necessarily going to be limited to clay pottery! The problem is, that it is not enough to just 'look at' such evidence. It is also necessary to be able to 'recognize' it, when it is 'seen', as the Calculus or Advanced Mathematics which an educated observer already knows. Such 'figurative potsherds' of an Advanced Lost Civilization are scattered all over Egypt! Sir Alan Gardiner in his "Egyptian Grammar" describes the Ancient Egyptian fractions used to divide the HEQAT Unit or 'Gallon (British Imperial almost exactly)'. He 'sees' that the 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32 and 1/64 fractions of the UDJAT or 'Whole Eye of Horus' add up to only 63/64 and quips, "presumably the missing 1/64 was supplied magically by Thoth." But he fails to 'recognize' that 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, 1/64, . . . is a well-known Calculus 'infinite sequence' which is associated with a Calculus 'infinite series' 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + 1/32 + 1/64 + . . . which, only by Calculus, can be added up to exactly 1. The missing 1/64 was thus undeniably supplied by Calculus over 4,000 years ago, which in turn could only have come from an Advanced Lost Civilization. History had to wait for Sir Isaac Newton to invent Calculus in 1687 AD, before we could ever calculate, or even know, the exact HEQAT unitary 'sum', to which it 'converges'. The UDJAT infinite series is just one out of an infinite number of such geometric progressions. Each one of them has its own 'first term', 'common ratio' and 'convergent sum', if the square of the 'common ratio' is less than 1. The UDJAT infinite series has a 'first term' of 1/2, a 'common ratio' of 1/2 and a 'convergent sum' of 1, when all of its infinite number of terms are added up. [For such an infinite geometric series, the 'Calculus limit' of its 'sum', as the number of its terms approaches infinity, is But in the Pyramid Texts, there is evidence that much more than our Calculus was known about the UDJAT infinite series, which is quite alien to Modern Science. The Calculus terms were clearly thought to have some connection with attaining the Paranormal Powers of the UDJAT Eye of Horus through the consciousness of a strange Star. The texts say that concentration on this Great Pyramid Star at first causes Second Sight, which then always leads to Levitation.
THISISTHESCENEOFTHESEENUNSEENTHEUNSEENSEENOFTHESCENEUNSEENTHISISTHESCENE
http://www.yeshuatyisrael.com/sheol.htm A GLIMPSE OF SHEOUL Luke 16:19 "Now there was a certain rich man, and he habitually dressed in purple and fine linen, gaily living in splendor every day.20 "And a certain poor man named Lazarus was laid at his gate, covered with sores,21 and longing to be fed with the crumbs which were falling from the rich man's table; besides, even the dogs were coming and licking his sores.22 "Now it came about that the poor man died and he was carried away by the angels to Abraham's bosom; and the rich man also died and was buried.23 "And in Hades he lifted up his eyes, being in torment, and *saw Abraham far away, and Lazarus in his bosom.24 "And he cried out and said, `Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool off my tongue; for I am in agony in this flame.'25 "But Abraham said, `Child, remember that during your life you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus bad things; but now he is being comforted here, and you are in agony.26 `And besides all this, between us and you there is a great chasm fixed, in order that those who wish to come over from here to you may not be able, and that none may cross over from there to us.'27 "And he said, `Then I beg you, Father, that you send him to my father's house—28 for I have five brothers—that he may warn them, lest they also come to this place of torment.'29 "But Abraham *said, `They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.'30 "But he said, `No, Father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent!'31 "But he said to him, `If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead.'" To be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord.2 Corinthians 5:6 Therefore, being always of good courage, and knowing that while we are at home in the body we are absent from the Lord—for we walk by faith, not by sight—we are of good courage, I say, and prefer rather to be absent from the body and to be at home with the Lord.Therefore also we have as our ambition, whether at home or absent, to be pleasing to Him.For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may be recompensed for his deeds in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad. Sheol or Hades is beneath the earthEzekiel 31:15 `Thus says the Lord God, "On the day when it went down to Sheol I caused lamentations; I closed the deep over it and held back its rivers. And its many waters were stopped up, and I made Lebanon mourn for it, and all the trees of the field wilted away on account of it.16 "I made the nations quake at the sound of its fall when I made it go down to Sheol with those who go down to the pit; and all the well-watered trees of Eden, the choicest and best of Lebanon, were comforted in the earth beneath.17 "They also went down with it to Sheol to those who were slain by the sword; and those who were its strength lived under its shade among the nations." Three distinct words are rendered "hell" in KJV. The R.V. is more exact. The Hebrew word Sheool, for example, in Deuteronomy 32:22 (R.V. "the lowest pit"), is probably derived from a root "to make hollow," and was seen as the common receptacle of the dead, below the earth. Sheol signifies depth in Job 11:8 (R.V.) and insatiability in Isaiah 5:14. "If I make my bed in hell [R.V. Sheol], behold, thou art there" (Psalms 139:8) shows it as a place to which the power of God extends. It is rendered "the grave" in Song of Solomon 8:6, signifying cruelty. The meaning of Sheol moves between the ideas of the grave, the underworld and the state of death. Throughout the ancient Near East, as elsewhere, the dead were pictured as existing in a subterranean realm known in Bab. as aralu and in Ugaritic as Õeres\, `earth'. But whereas these were ruled by their own gods, God was the ruler of Sheol. Sheol was below the surface of the earth (Ezk. 31:15, 17; Ps. 86:13), a place of dust (Jb. 17:16), darkness (Jb. 10:21), silence (Ps. 94:17) and forgetfulness (Ps. 88:12). Sometimes the distinctions of earthly life are pictured as continuing in Sheol (Is. 14:9; Ezk. 32:27), but always it is a place of weakness and joylessness. In some passages Sheol has a punitive aspect (e.g. Ps. 49:13-14) and premature committal to Sheol is a form of judgment. The OT sees earthly life as the arena for the service of God; it is there that his word can be received, his sacrifices offered, his interventions experienced. Therefore in a real sense to be in Sheol is to be cut off from his hand (Ps. 88:3-5). However, God is both present in Sheol (Ps. 139:8) and able to deliver from it (Ps. 16:10). Some have seen in words such as Õab_addoÆn, `destruction' (Jb. 31:12; 26:6; 28:22; Ps.88:11; Pr. 15:11; 27:20), sûah\at_, `pit' and perhaps sometimes also `corruption' (E. F. Sutcliffe, The Old Testament and the Future Life, 1946, pp. 39f.; Jb. 33:24; Ps. 16:10; Ezk. 28:8, etc.) and boÆr, `pit' (Ps. 30:3; Ezk. 31:14), a place of punishment within Sheol. But no passage where they occur necessitates this interpretation, and the idea is not explicitly formulated in the OT. These words are better regarded as synonyms of Sheol, with which they all sometimes occur in parallelism. In the later Jewish literature we meet with divisions within Sheol for the wicked and the righteous, in which each experiences a foretaste of his final destiny (Enoch 22:1-14). This idea appears to underlie the imagery of the parable of the rich man and Lazarus in Lk. 16:19-31. The Gk. hadeµs used in this passage represents the underworld, or realm of the dead, in the classics. In the lxx it almost always translates sûeÕoÆl, and in the NT the Pesh. renders it by sûeyuÆl. It is therefore the NT equivalent of Sheol. It is used in connection with the death of Christ in Acts 2:27, 31, which quotes Ps. 16:10. In Mt. 16:18 Christ says that the gates of Hades (cf. Is. 38:10; Pss. 9:13; 107:18) shall not prevail against his church. As the gates of a city are essential to its power, the meaning here is probably the power of death. The phrase `brought down to Hades' in Mt. 11:23 is best understood metaphorically of the depths of shame. In Rev., Christ holds the keys of Death and Hades (1:18). Their power (6:8) is broken and they are banished to the lake of fire (20:13-14). The word paradise (Gk. paradeisos) occurs in only three instances in the NT (Lk. 23:43; 2 Cor. 12:3; Rev. 2:7). The context shows that the predominating sense is that of the later development of the word. In Lk. 23:43 the word `paradise' is used by Jesus for the place where souls go immediately after death, cf. the concealed paradise in later Jewish thought. The same idea is also present in the parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Lk. 16:19-31). HELL. `Hell' in the NT renders the Gk. word transliterated as `Gehenna' (Mt. 5:22, 29-30; 10:28; 18:9; 23:15, 33; Mk. 9:43, 45, 47; Lk. 12:5; Jas. 3:6). The name is derived from the Heb. geÆ(ben)(beneÆ) hinnoµm, the Valley of (the son[s] of Hinnom, a valley near Jerusalem (Jos. 15:8; 18:16), where children were sacrificed by fire in connection with pagan rites (2 Ki. 23:10; 2 Ch. 28:3; 33:6; Je. 7:31; 32:35). Its original derivation is obscure, but Hinnom is almost certainly the name of a person. In later Jewish writings Gehenna came to mean the place of punishment for sinners (Assumption of Moses 10:10; 2 Esdras 7:36). It was depicted as a place of unquenchable fire—the general idea of fire to express the divine judgment is found in the OT (Dt. 32:22; Dn. 7:10). The rabbinic literature contains various opinions as to who would suffer eternal punishment. The ideas were widespread that the sufferings of some would be terminated by annihilation, or that the fires of Gehenna were in some cases purgatorial (Rosh Hashanah 16b-17a; Baba MeziÕa 58b; Mishnah Eduyoth 2. 10). But those who held these doctrines also taught the reality of eternal punishment for certain classes of sinners. Both this literature and the Apocryphal books affirm belief in an eternal retribution (cf. Judith 16:17; Psalms of Solomon 3:13). The teaching of the NT endorses this past belief. The fire of hell is unquenchable (Mk. 9:43), eternal (Mt. 18:8), its punishment is the converse of eternal life (Mt. 25:46). There is no suggestion that those who enter hell ever emerge from it. However, the NT leaves the door open for the belief that while hell as a manifestation of God's implacable wrath against sin is unending, the existence of those who suffer in it may not be. It is difficult to reconcile the ultimate fulfilment of the whole universe in Christ (Eph. 1:10; Col. 1:20) with the continued existence of those who reject him. Some scholars have contended that an eternal punishment is one which is eternal in its effects; in any case eternal does not necessarily mean never-ending, but implies `long duration extending to the writer's mental horizon' (J. A. Beet). On the other hand Rev. 20:10 does indicate conscious, never-ending torment for the devil and his agents, albeit in a highly symbolic passage, and some would affirm that a similar end awaits human beings who ultimately refuse to repent. In any case, nothing should be allowed to detract from the seriousness of our Lord's warnings about the terrible reality of God's judgment in the world to come. In Jas. 3:6 Gehenna, like the bottomless pit in Rev. 9:1ff.; 11:7, appears to be the source of evil on the earth. NT imagery concerning eternal punishment is not uniform. As well as fire it is described as darkness (Mt. 25:30; 2 Pet. 2:17), death (Rev. 2:11), destruction and exclusion from the presence of the Lord (2 Thes. 1:9; Mt. 7:21-23), and a debt to pay (Mt. 5:25-26). In 2 Pet. 2:4 only, we find the Verb tartarooµ, translated in rsv `cast into hell', and rendered by the Pesh. `cast down to the lower regions'. Tartaros is the classical word for the place of eternal punishment but is here applied to the intermediate sphere of punishment for fallen angels. Hadeµs (a{dh", (86)), the region of departed spirits of the lost (but including the blessed dead in periods preceding the Ascension of Christ). It has been thought by some that the word etymologically meant the unseen (from a, negative, and eido, to see), but this derivation is questionable; a more probable derivation is from hadoµ, signifying all–receiving. It corresponds to "Sheol" in the O.T. In the A.V. of the O.T. and N.T., it has been unhappily rendered "Hell," e.g., Psa. 16:10; or "the grave," e.g., Gen. 37:35; or "the pit," Num. 16:30, 33; in the N.T. the Revisers have always used the rendering "Hades;" in the O.T.they have not been uniform in the translation, e.g., in Isa. 14:15, "hell" (marg., "Sheol"); usually they have "Sheol" in the text and "the grave" in the margin. It never denotes the grave, nor is it the permanent region of the lost; in point of time it is, for such, intermediate between decease and the doom of Gehenna. For the condition, see Luke 16:23-31. The word is used four times in the Gospels, and always by the Lord, Matt. 11:23; 16:18; Luke 10:15; 16:23; it is used with reference to the soul of Christ, Acts 2:27, 31; Christ declares that He has the keys of it, Rev. 1:18; in Rev. 6:8 it is personified, with the signification of the temporary destiny of the doomed; it is to give up those who are therein, 20:13, and is to be cast into the lake of fire, ver. 14. BEMA SEAT JUDGMENT FOR CHURCH SAINTS ONLY FOR REWARDS Believers will be judged, but not for their sins, because their sins were judged on the cross. We are judged for our works done in the body. See The Seven Significant Judgements for details about the judgments of God. Our works will be judged at the Bema. The Bema is the term for the Judgment Seat. In the synagogue the Bema is the raised platform in the center of the synagogue where the Torah is read. Messiah will be at the Bema to judge our works.
THE FAR YONDER SCRIBE ASKS A QUESTION OF THE ZED ALIZ ZED ZED ALIZ ZED WHAT IS THAT THAT THAT ISISIS ? ISISIS THAT THAT THAT THAT IS THE ALL OF EVERYTHING ISISIS THE GREAT MOTHER WOMB OF CREATION HOLY WHOLLY HOLY ISISIS THAT THE ZED ALIZ ZED IS THAT THAT THAT HOLY WHOLLY HOLY ISISIS AND I THE ZED ALIZ ZED SAID AM AZIZ ONE DEAD WHILST ALL ELSE LIVES IN ALL TRUTH SAID THE FAR YONDER SCRIBE IS THAT THE TRUTH OF IT ALL ? THAT IN ALL TRUTH IS THE TRUTH OF IT ALL SAID THE ZED ALIZ ZED YOU AND ALL ELSE ARE AZIZ ALIVE AND I THE ZED ALIZ ZED AM AZIZ DEAD YOU ARE SAYING SAID THE FAR YONDER SCRIBE IN SWIFT REPEAT THAT THE TRUTH OF IT ALL IS THAT ALL ELSE IS ALIVE AND YOU ARE AZIZ DEAD DEAD IS THAT THE TRUTH OF IT ALL YES SAID THE ZED ALIZ ZED ALL ELSE IS AZIZ DEAD AND ONLY I AM ALIVE WHAT SAY YOU SAID THE FAR YONDER SCRIBE WHO ARE YOU AND WHY ARE YOU HERE ? I AM THE ETERNAL DANCER DANCING THE ETERNAL DANCE THAT AM I SAID ZED ALIZ ZED I AM THAT LAZARUS BACK FROM THE DEAD COME BACK TO TELL YOU ALL I SHALL TELL YOU ALL HEARKEN BELOVED CHILDREN OF THE RAINBOW LIGHT WITHIN THE MINDS EYE OF ETERNAL DIVINE THOUGHT I AND YOU ARE ONE ALL THAT THAT THAT BELOVED ISISIS THAT SENSE OF YOU THAT YOU HAVE THAT SENSE OF A WOMAN BEING THAT SENSE OF A MAN BEING THAT SENSE OF BEING A HUMAN BEING THAT SENSE OF BEING HUMAN THAT SENSE OF BEING AN INDIVIDUAL BEING THAT SENSE OF AN I AM THAT BLESSED LIGHT HUNGRY CHILDREN OF THE RAINBOW THAT IS IN ALL REALITY AN ILLUSION A LIE OF THE EYE INTHE LIVING MINDS I OF THE GREAT TRUTH BEHOLDER A MISCONCEPTION OF BEING I YOU ME ISISIS THAT THAT ISISIS ALL ARE ONE ONE ARE ALL LIVING LOVING LIGHT LIGHT LOVING LIVING TEMPLES OF THAT THAT THAT HOLY WHOLLY HOLY ISISIS THAT THAT THAT ISISIS AWAITS THE BIRTHING OF THE GOLDEN CHILD AND YOU NAMUH ARE THAT GOLDEN CHILD O NAMUH THY DELIVERANCE IS AT HAND EMBRACE THEE THE REALITY OF THY TRUE NATURE AWAKEN OH BLESSED LOTUS EATERS FROM THY SLUMBER DEEP KNOW NOW NOW KNOW THAT THOU ART A LIVING BREATHING THINKING TEMPLE THAT IS IS THAT THAT THAT IS IS THAT THAT THAT THAT HOLY WHOLLY HOLY ISISIS THAT EVERYTHING THAT ISISIS THAT ART THOU THOU ART THAT THAT HOLY TEMPLE THAT TEMPLE HOLY THAT ART THOU THOU ART THAT HOLY HOLY HOLY ALL HAIL THE RAINBOW LIGHT OF THE LIVING GOD FOR IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE WORD AND THE WORD WAS WITH GOD AND THE WORD WAS GOD ALL HAIL THE JEWEL AT THE CENTRE OF THE LOTUS
|
 |
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||